True or False: Guardians should provide services that are least restrictive to both the guardian and the person they serve.

The assertion that guardians should provide services that are least restrictive to both the guardian and the person they serve is based on principles of guardianship that prioritize the autonomy and rights of the individual being served. The correct perspective emphasizes that guardianship should involve the least amount of restriction necessary to ensure the well-being of the individual. This promotes dignity and independence for the person under guardianship, which is a central tenet of guardianship law and practice.

In practice, this means that guardians are expected to make decisions and take actions that respect the personal freedoms and legal rights of the individual, minimizing interference in their daily life while still ensuring necessary safeguards are in place for their protection. The goal is to enhance the individual's quality of life rather than impose unnecessary limitations. Therefore, stating that the assertion is false overlooks the essential principles underlying effective guardianship, which advocate for minimal restrictions whenever possible. Thus, the notion of least restrictive services aligns with best practices in fiduciary roles, making the original statement about guardianship incorrect.