Can a person with a prior personal relationship with a client be appointed as a guardian?

The option stating that prior relationships are acceptable but must not continue is correct because it aligns with the principles governing guardianship appointments. In many jurisdictions, having a prior personal relationship with a client does not automatically disqualify an individual from serving as a guardian. However, it is crucial that this prior relationship does not continue to influence the guardian's decision-making or the care of the individual under guardianship.

This is to ensure that the guardian can act in the best interest of the ward, free from emotional biases or conflicts that could arise from continuing personal ties. The guardian's primary responsibility is to advocate for and protect the well-being of the ward, which could be compromised if the prior relationship continues to exert influence. Thus, the option correctly asserts that while prior relationships can be a factor, they must not persist during the guardianship to maintain the integrity of the guardian's role.

The other options suggest scenarios that can lead to conflicts of interest or incompatible dynamics between the guardian and the ward, which could potentially undermine the effectiveness and appropriateness of the guardianship.